Indeed, there have been painfully slow times just passed. The football show continues, although painfully slowly, and beyond that work has ground to a depressing halt.
Mac Pro is half paid for, although its probably going to be now that it all slows done. Still waiting on Apex to pay, that will be a huge weight off my shoulders.
Have been experimenting as of late with converting HD to any format readable and editable in Windows – honestly this has been a fight not worth fighting by any stretch of the imagination. Using compressor and Quicktime Pro – the same version installed on both machines – we have been able to get hardly anything to work. Plus we’ve been enjoying the frustration of no proper mass storage solution to be used between the machines. Currently using a FAT32 drive to go between the systems, we are also having to deal with the incredibly inconvenient 4Gb file size limit. Bah. Initially I provided the unaltered HDV 720p24 in a mov container, which would play back audio but no picture, even with Qwuicktime Pro 7.2 on Windows. On the Mac it played fine (albeit a bit choppy on the PowerBook G4).
Next I tried a DV codec in a mov container, DV progressive at 24fps, but once again hit a similar wall, wherein the footage had to be covnerted to play back correctly – and the audio was wildly out of sync.
Finally, I provided the most basic, universal file I possibly could. Mov container, DV codec, interlaced, 25fps (50 fields), anamorphic widescreen. The quality was still good, and it wasn’t mission critical footage, so that was okay. The point here being had it been mission critical, and had time been of the essence, we would have been screwed a little by it.
Herein is my problem as an editor – I was unprepared and unaware, I had no idea what software he had at his end, a massive oversight on my own part. I also initially prepared a file that was the full 40 minutes at 25p, however it was over 8Gb – and thusly would not fit on the FAT formatted disk.
Something to consider truly.
Mac Pro revisions are expected in November using the new Penryn CPUs, not 100% on it but they may all be Quad Core, and the price shift should change the standard CPUs to a dual 2.81GHz Configuration – also, the highest end Quad Core machines should peak at dual quad-core 3.11GHz, a modest improvement but good nontheless. Assuming these new 45nM CPUs use the same Socket 771 then any current Mac Pro should support a simple drop in upgrade of the existing CPUs to newer quad core Xeons with a whopping 12Mb Cache. This is probably something I will consider in the near future with my own Mac Pro once it has arrived and my finances are in order.
Gotta reboot now
J
Posted by innebateav
Posted by innebateav
Posted by innebateav